Frontiers of Entrepreneurship
Research Return
to 1997 Topical Index |
Emeric Solymossy
Case Western Reserve University
INTRODUCTION
MOTIVATION AND
VENTURE SUCCESS
METHODOLOGY
FINDINGS
Motivation
TABLE 1: Validity of Push / Pull Classification of Previously Utilized Motivational Influences (Entrepreneur's identification of influences is a total of first, second and third priorities listings.)
TABLE 2: Frequency of Motivational Influence Pairings (n=291)
TABLE 3: Comparison of Primary Motivational Influences
Success
TABLE 4: Regression Results
TABLE 5: Correlation Of Performance Measures
TABLE 6: Effects Of Motivation On Success
ABSTRACT
Interviews with Hungarian entrepreneurs suggested that the
motivation for initiating a venture was irrelevant to the
subsequent success of the venture, contradicting implications
garnered from previous research. An exploratory study
(Solymossy, 1996) provided initial support for the reliability of
the push / pull classification model, however, suggested the
absence of a significant relationship between venture initiation
motivation and three measures of venture performance.
This study, utilizing 341 respondents, is undertaken to
permit more rigorous testing of the relationship between venture
initiation motivation and venture success. Regression
analysis utilizing four measures of venture success, while
exhibiting significant Anovas, lacks explanatory power. A
linear relationship between motivational orientation and success
is therefore deemed to be inconsequential. Further analysis
is conducted with MANOVA to explore differences between the
two motivationally oriented groups, yielding significant
differences in levels of general satisfaction, network
utilization, levels of technology and confidence. Future
research using an expanded operationalization for venture
success, and measuring other differentiable aspects of
entrepreneurship is suggested.
© 1997 Babson College All Rights Reserved
Last Updated 06/01/98